Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the preoperative data between aortic valve repair and replacement

From: Early outcomes of aortic valve repair versus replacement for aortic regurgitation: a single-center experience

 

AVr (n= 39)

AVR (n= 46)

P value

Age (years)

43.8± 8.6

49.6± 7.2

0.002

Males

32 (82.1%)

38 (82.6%)

0.95

BMI (kg.m2)

27.6 (24.2–32.3)

29.4 (25.4–33)

0.32

BSA (m2)

1.9 (1.8- 2.)

1.9 (1.9–2.1)

0.09

NYHA class

  

<0.001

 I

13 (33.3%)

2 (4.4%)

 

 II

24 (61.5%)

25 (54.4%)

 

 III

2 (5.1%)

18 (39.1%)

 

 IV

0

1 (2.2%)

 

CCS class

  

0.03

 I

4 (10.3%)

2 (4.4%)

 

 II

25 (64.1%)

20 (43.5%)

 

 III

10 (25.6%)

24 (52.2%)

 

Diabetes mellitus

13 (33.3%)

16 (34.8%)

0.89

Hypercholesterolemia

7 (18.9%)

18 (40%)

0.04

Hypertension

17 (43.6%)

31 (67.4%)

0.03

Smokers

1 (2.6%)

9 (19.6%)

0.02

Atrial fibrillation

5 (12.8%)

5 (10.9%)

0.78

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

13.5 (12.8–14.1)

14.1 (12.2–15)

0.42

Creatinine (mg/dl)

0.9 (0.9–1.1)

0.9 (0.8–1.1)

0.74

Bilirubin (mg/dl)

0.7± 0.2

0.6± 0.2

0.08

Ejection fraction

  

0.85

 ˃50%

31 (83.8%)

37 (82.2%)

 

 30–49%

6 (16.2%)

8 (17.8%)

 

Valve pathology

  

0.15

 Rheumatic

24 (61.5%)

35 (78.1%)

 

 Degenerative

15 (38.5%)

11 (23.9%)

 

Valve lesion

  

<0.001

 RCC prolapse

9 (23.1%)

1 (2.2%)

 

 LCC prolapse

3 (7.7%)

2 (4.3%)

 

 NCC prolapse

18 (46.2%)

10 (21.7%)

 

 Two cusp prolapse

1 (2.6%)

2 (2.2%)

 

 Root dilatation

8 (20.5%)

10 (21.7%)

 

 Retracted cusp

0

20 (43.5%)

 

 Cusp prolapse and root dilatation

0

1 (2.2%)

 
  1. Continuous data were presented as mean and SD or median (25th–75th percentiles) and categorical data as frequencies and percentages
  2. Avr aortic valve repair, AVR aortic valve replacement, BMI body mass index, BSA body surface ares, CCS Canadian Cardiovascular Society, NYHA New York Heart Association, RCC right coronary cusp, LCC left coronary cusp, NCC non-coroanry cusp